The book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh" also describes the accusations of Deborah Ramirez, another classmate of Yale, and raises new questions about the actions of the senators and the FBI before Kavanaugh was confirmed last October.
Kavanaugh has publicly denied all charges against him. Through a spokesman for the Supreme Court, he refused to comment on the book.
CNN purchased a copy of the book before its official release. Here are five takeaways:
At the center of the impact of the book is the idea that the charges against Kavanaugh have not been thoroughly investigated since the GOP-led Senate has been working rapidly to confirm it.
After the auditions in which Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual violence during the high school years and Kavanaugh's heated denials, the Republicans were ready to overcome the nomination. In the end, the FBI was asked to take a week and examine the charges against Kavanaugh. At that time the Democrats complained that the investigation was limited and Pogrebin and Kelly seem to agree.
Several people wanted to talk to the FBI or the Senate Judiciary Committee about a Yale incident involving Kavanaugh and Ramirez, in which he would expose his penis at a party.
A former Kavanaugh schoolmate, Mark Krasberg, "contacted three different Senate offices, a FBI field office and the Senate judiciary committee to communicate his information, but was passed around, interrupted or ignored until the last hours of the investigation, October 5, "states the book.
The former Yale student colleague Ken Appold reported a similar problem, "transferred from the e-mail to an 800 number to an online form" and never heard from the FBI.
"I was not surprised; the investigative powers of the FBI were too limited. It was not part of their mandate to do more than was absolutely necessary," said Appold, according to the book. "If they had interviewed me, I would have been happy to cooperate."
A third classmate from Yale, Kathleen Charlton, "also tried in vain to reach the FBI," the authors write.
The FBI declined to comment on the book at CNN.
A new accident
The offices of at least two senators on the judiciary committee learned that a classmate of Kavanaugh, Max Stier, had witnessed Kavanaugh having committed an incident similar to Ramirez's accusations.
"Stier transmitted his memories to the senators during the confirmation process and later clarified his willingness to share them with the FBI, but he refused to talk about it publicly," the book states.
It is not clear how much the FBI has examined the accident, if at all. On October 2, 2018, Democratic Senator Delaware Chris Coons asked the FBI to talk to more people and identified Stier, according to CNN.
"The story came to the FBI but was never investigated," the book states.
CNN is not reporting the details of the charge and has not independently confirmed the account. The victim refused to be interviewed by the authors of the book and her friends told the authors that she does not remember the accident.
Stier refused a request for comment from CNN.
Keyser did not remember the alleged Ford accident
The book provides extensive quotes from Leyland Keyser, the woman Ford told senators attended a "small gathering" in a Maryland home on the night of the alleged incident with Kavanaugh.
Before the hearings last year, a lawyer from Keyser stated in a note that his client had "no recollection of ever being at a party or a rally when (Kavanaugh) was present, with or without, Dr. Ford ".
At the same hearing, Ford testified that Keyser has "significant health challenges" that she was glad that "she is taking care of herself". Ford told the senators that he didn't expect Leland to remember the evening, saying, "It was a very insignificant party."
The authors observe in the book that, since high school, Keyser "had been derailed by a multitude of ailments, subjected to numerous back surgeries, a knee replacement and other treatments, leaving her unable to work. A chronic Mayo pain program Clinic helped, but he still had many bad days. "
In the book, it is said that Keyser states that after a second meeting with the agents of the FBI his "general posture" towards Ford was that "I had no faith in history".
According to the book, he had "second thoughts" from his initial interview four days earlier with the FBI when he said he could not remember the event described by Ford.
"The more Keyser thought about it, the more doubtful it was on Ford's account," the book states, pointing out that the aspects "didn't sound true to them." Among them, he remembered that he didn't remember going out with people who were going to Georgetown Prep, "as much as my friends think" and that even after reviewing the photos "he didn't know Kavanaugh".
The book says that Keyser provided investigators with his "entire history of use".
"I said to myself about the FBI," he said, "pretty much everything I've ever done in my life."
According to the book Keyser claimed to have "his story with drugs and alcohol" but that he was not a "heavy drinker at that point in high school".
Keyser told the authors of Ford: "I think something happened, but I don't know what. And I haven't been close enough to her over the years to know that something has gone down. I haven't seen her for a long time, a long time. I think that something has happened to her and that perhaps she is the victim of a kind of trauma. "
But Keyser "strongly supports his lack of confidence in the details of Kavanaugh's account:" Those facts together I don't remember, and it made no sense. " Https://www.cnn.com/ "
The book notes that "months after Kavanaugh was already seated in the field, a copy of a National Review article on his confirmation was hanging, framed in Keyser's bathroom. Dated October 8, 2018, it bore the title" Was Leyland Keyser the Hero of the Kavanaugh Controversy? "
Pogrebin and Kelly claim that Keyser continued to appear troubled by his unexpected role in the confirmation battle several months later. In a text message to one of the authors in March 2019, Keyser stated that "he believed he was being checked at home, probably by people related to the Kavanaugh issue".
The story of Ramirez
Ramirez was the second person, after Ford, to publicly raise allegations of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh. The report of Yale's former student was first published by The New Yorker last September and Ramirez further investigates the new incident book in a common dorm area.
"During the drinking game, Ramirez said that the boys continued to take it to drink more, and got drunk. At one point, someone tied a fake penis and pointed it at her," states the book.
"Then, later, Ramirez said, he had a penis thrust in his face. He remembered pushing it away, saying," It's not a real penis. "But this penis was real, he remembered, for the first time he had touched one by chance ", adds the book. "It was something she hadn't planned to do until she got married."
Ramirez says he remembered "Kavanaugh pulled up his pants, looked swollen, as if he had just done something really fantastic" and laughed.
Another student yelled down the hall: "Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie's face."
When the story was released last year, Kavanaugh said: "This alleged 35-year-old event didn't happen. The people who knew me then know that it didn't happen, and they said it. This is a smear, clear and simple ".
Yale's former student colleague, Appold, said, however, that at the time people were talking about the accident, recalling that another student claimed to have attended.
Kavanaugh's struggle will never really end
The book is an opportunity for everyone to repeat the Kavanaugh nomination. The profound feelings of hearing have not disappeared and will probably never go away forever.
"By not allowing any chance of ever attacking anyone, including Ford, or exposing his penis to Ramirez, Kavanaugh may have gotten into a lie," Pogrebin and Kelly write. "But this is the case only if he has deliberately made a lie by denying the events he actually remembered. If he really has no recollection of it, and no document, friend or other evidence emerged, he was not knowingly dishonest."
Liberals, still pungent by the confirmation of Kavanaugh to replace the conservative centrist Anthony Kennedy – the swinging vote on issues such as abortion and the Supreme Court race – see further alleged details of his behavior at Yale as evidence that he would never had to be confirmed.
Former Vice President Joe Biden, leader of the Democratic presidential nominations, said the story raises "deeply troubling questions about the integrity of the confirmation process that led Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court in the first place".
Other Democratic contenders – Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Kamala Harris, former Rep. Beto O & # 39; Rourke and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg asked for Kavanaugh's accusation.
For the President, the Kavanaugh hearings and the close-up vote last year were a political advantage to convince the Republicans to challenge the narrow Senate competitions in the red states and defeat the democratic operators, actually increasing the Senate margin of the GOP from 51 to 53.
The leader of the Senate majority, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said that "the main democrats have tried to grab another umpteenth unjustified, little-reported and baseless accusation against Judge Brett Kavanaugh".
. (tagsToTranslate) policy (t) Brett Kavanaugh book: 5 takeaways – CNNPolitics